Herunterladen Diese Seite drucken

BD Veritor System Bedienungsanleitung Seite 15

Vorschau ausblenden Andere Handbücher für Veritor System:

Werbung

Verfügbare Sprachen
  • DE

Verfügbare Sprachen

  • DEUTSCH, seite 43
Table 2: Summary of the Performance of the BD Veritor System for Rapid Detection of Flu A+B Test Compared to
PCR for All Swabs - U.S. Sites
POC: BD Flu A
P
P
122
N
33*
Total
155
Reference Method: PCR
PPA: 78.7% (95% C.I: 71.6–84.4%)
NPA: 97.8% (95% C.I: 95.7–98.9%)
* Of the 33 PCR positive, BD Veritor negative Influenza A specimens, eight were positive in the BD Veritor assay using a second swab
specimen (reference method specimen) collected from the same patient.
** Of the 26 PCR positive, BD Veritor negative Influenza B specimens, six were positive in the BD Veritor assay using a second swab
specimen (reference method specimen) collected from the same patient.
Table 3: Summary of the Performance of the BD Veritor System for Rapid Detection of Flu A+B Test Compared to
PCR for Nasopharyngeal Swabs - U.S. Sites
POC: BD Flu A
P
P
53
N
18
Total
71
Reference Method: PCR
PPA: 74.6% (95% C.I: 63.4–83.3%)
NPA: 96.4% (95% C.I: 91.9–98.5%)
Table 4: Summary of the Performance of the BD Veritor System for Rapid Detection of Flu A+B Test Compared to
PCR for Nasal Swabs – U.S. Sites
POC: BD Flu A
P
P
69
N
15
Total
84
Reference Method: PCR
PPA: 82.1% (95% C.I: 72.6–88.9%)
NPA: 98.6% (95% C.I: 96.1–99.5%)
The performance of the BD Veritor System for Rapid Detection of Flu A+B test at the Japan sites were also compared to the
same FDA-cleared Influenza A and B molecular assay (PCR) and are presented in Table 5 through Table 7.
Table 5: Summary of the Performance of the BD Veritor System for Rapid Detection of Flu A+B Test Compared to
PCR for all Swabs - Japan Sites
POC: BD Flu A
P
P
67
N
4
Total
71
Reference Method: PCR
PPA: 94.4% (95% C.I: 86.4–97.8%)
NPA: 96.7% (95% C.I: 92.4–98.6%)
Table 6: Summary of the Performance of the BD Veritor System for Rapid Detection of Flu A+B Test Compared to
PCR for all Nasopharyngeal Swabs - Japan Sites
POC: BD Flu A
P
P
30
N
2
Total
32
Reference Method: PCR
PPA: 93.8% (95% C.I: 79.9–98.3%)
NPA: 98.8% (95% C.I: 93.6–99.8%)
Reference PCR
N
Total
8
130
352
385
360
515
Reference PCR
N
Total
5
58
135
153
140
211
Reference PCR
N
Total
3
72
217
232
220
304
Reference PCR
N
Total
5
72
145
149
150
221
Reference PCR
N
Total
1
31
83
85
84
116
POC: BD Flu B
P
N
Total
Reference Method: PCR
PPA: 74.3% (95% C.I: 65–81.8%)
NPA: 99.5% (95% C.I: 98.3–99.9%)
POC: BD Flu B
P
N
Total
Reference Method: PCR
PPA: 73.3% (95% C.I: 55.6–85.8%)
NPA: 99.4% (95% C.I: 96.9–99.9%)
POC: BD Flu B
P
N
Total
Reference Method: PCR
PPA: 74.6% (95% C.I: 63.4–83.3%)
NPA: 99.6% (95% C.I: 97.6–99.9%)
POC: BD Flu B
P
N
Total
Reference Method: PCR
PPA: 91.4% (95% C.I: 82.5–96%)
NPA: 94.7% (95% C.I: 89.9–97.3%)
POC: BD Flu B
P
N
Total
Reference Method: PCR
PPA: 97.4% (95% C.I: 86.8–99.5%)
NPA: 97.4% (95% C.I: 91.0–99.3%)
15
Reference PCR
P
N
Total
75
2
77
26**
412
438
101
414
515
Reference PCR
P
N
Total
22
1
23
8
180
188
30
181
211
Reference PCR
P
N
Total
53
1
54
18
232
250
71
233
304
Reference PCR
P
N
Total
64
8
72
6
143
149
70
151
221
Reference PCR
P
N
Total
38
2
40
1
75
76
39
77
116

Werbung

loading