Rotoclear S3 Bedienungsanleitung Seite 50

ROTOCLEAR S3 50
The results show:
The impact resistance of the test speci-
men (in line with DIN EN ISO 16090-1 Machine
Tool Safety – Machining Centres, Milling Machin-
ery, Transfer Machinery) was not affected when
screw-mounted and bonding flanges were used in
milling machinery. This supports the presumption
of conformity that use of either mounting method
is permissible in machining centres and milling
machinery under standard-compliant conditions.
The impact resistance of the test specimen
(iaw. DIN EN ISO 23125 Machine Tools – Safe-
ty – Lathes) was not influenced when adhe-
sive-mounted flanges are used on lathes. This
supports the presumption of conformity that the
use of adhesive-mounted flanges is permitted
in lathes under standard-compliant conditions,
whereas use of screw-mounted flanges is not.
Please note that Rotoclear S3 can nevertheless
influence the impact resistance of the window
on workspace enclosures of machinery. Machin-
ery manufacturers are required to provide a risk
assessment as proof that the impact resistance
of the workspace enclosure employed meets ap-
plicable standards. Parties operating a retrofitted
Rotoclear S3 are required to demonstrate this via
a risk assessment.
An application-specific risk assessment is re-
quired before using the Rotoclear S3 in metal-cut-
ting machines that are not covered by DIN EN
ISO 16090-1 and DIN EN ISO 23125 (e.g. grinding
machines). Impact resistance must be proven in-
dividually by the operator or distributor of the re-
spective machine tool.